How agentic AI is redefining the developer workflow —
from autocomplete to autonomous engineering
Viktor Klochkov
2026 · Press S for speaker notes
Inspired by
Pragmatic Vibe Clauding
by Yarik Yermilov,
Principal Software Engineer @ Superhuman/Grammarly
The Status Quo
The Copilot-Style Workflow
How It Works
👨💻 Developer opens file in IDE
✏ Starts typing → gets inline suggestions
💬 Opens chat panel → asks a question
📋 Copies answer → pastes into code
🔄 Repeats for each file, each change
Limitations
Reactive, not proactive — waits for you to type before suggesting
File-scoped context — sees the current file, not the full codebase
No execution — cannot run commands, tests, or builds
Manual orchestration — you decide what to change and where
No memory across sessions — every chat starts fresh
IDE-bound — tied to VS Code / JetBrains plugin ecosystem
The Paradigm Shift
The Rise of AI Agents
AI agents don't just suggest — they plan, execute, and iterate autonomously
🤖
Claude Code
Terminal-native agent with skills, sub-agents, and MCP integration
🔭
Cursor / Windsurf
IDE-based agents with codebase indexing and multi-file editing
🚀
Devin / OpenHands
Cloud-based autonomous agents in sandboxed environments
💫
Aider / Cline
Open-source terminal agents with git-aware editing
What they share: Autonomous task execution, multi-file awareness, tool use (shell, browser, APIs), iterative self-correction, and the ability to work on a task while you do something else.
Meet the Agent
Introduction to Claude Code
What It Is
Terminal-native — runs in your shell, not locked to an IDE
Autonomous agent — reads, writes, and executes code on its own
Full repo awareness — understands your entire codebase, not just open files
# Claude can now directly query your DB:
> Show me all users who signed up
in the last 7 days
# Or interact with GitHub:
> Create a PR from my current branch
with a summary of all changes
Multi-Agent Coordination
Agent Teams & Orchestrators
Lead👑
Orchestrator
Plans & delegates tasks
→
Worker A💻
Frontend
UI & components
→
Worker B⚙
Backend
API & logic
→
Worker C📊
Testing
Tests & validation
How It Works
Lead agent decomposes the task into subtasks
Workers operate in parallel git worktrees
Each worker has its own context & tools
Lead agent merges results and resolves conflicts
When to Use
Full-stack features touching many files
Large-scale refactoring across modules
Parallel implementation + test writing
Multi-service / monorepo changes
Real-World C++
C++ Refactoring with Claude Code
Before — Legacy C++ code
// Raw pointers, manual memory, C-style casts
void processData(DataManager* mgr) {
Record* records = mgr->getRecords();
int count = mgr->getCount();
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
Record* r = &records[i];
void* raw = (void*)r->payload;
char* buf = new char[r->size];
memcpy(buf, raw, r->size);
if (validate(buf, r->size))
mgr->commit((Record*)buf);
delete[] buf;
}
}
After — Modern C++17
// Smart pointers, ranges, type-safe casts
void processData(DataManager& mgr) {
for (auto& record : mgr.records()) {
auto payload =
std::span{record.payload()};
auto buf =
std::make_unique<std::byte[]>(
payload.size());
std::ranges::copy(payload,
buf.get());
if (validate({buf.get(),
payload.size()}))
mgr.commit(std::move(buf));
}
}
How it works: Claude Code explores the full codebase in plan mode, identifies all affected files, applies modernization patterns consistently, then runs your test suite to verify nothing broke — across hundreds of files in a single session.
Real-World C++
Refactoring Tasks for Claude Code
Task 1
Modernize Raw Pointers
Replace new/delete with unique_ptr, shared_ptr. Convert C-style casts to static_cast / reinterpret_cast. Fix ownership semantics across call chains.
Task 2
Apply Modern Idioms
Range-based loops, std::span, std::optional, structured bindings, [[nodiscard]], constexpr where applicable.
Task 3
Extract & Decouple
Break god-classes into focused components. Introduce interfaces for testability. Apply SOLID principles across 50+ files.
Task 4
Migrate Build System
Convert Makefiles to CMake. Update include paths, link targets, and compiler flags across the entire project.
Why Agents Excel Here
Repetitive patterns across hundreds of files
Needs full-repo context to track ownership chains
Agent can compile & test after each change
Prompt Example
Modernize all raw pointer usage in
src/core/ to smart pointers.
Run cmake --build && ctest after
each file to verify correctness.
Test-Driven Development
TDD with Claude Code
Step 1🗺
Plan
Explore codebase & design approach
→
Step 2📝
Write Tests
Define expected behavior first
→
Step 3💻
Implement
Write code to make tests pass
→
Step 4✅
Validate
Run suite, fix failures, iterate
Key advantage: Claude Code follows this loop autonomously — it explores, writes tests, implements, runs the suite, and self-corrects failures without manual intervention.
What Claude Code Does
Reads CLAUDE.md to learn your test framework & conventions
Generates comprehensive edge-case tests
Runs the suite, reads failures, fixes code
Repeats until all tests pass
Best Practices
Document test commands in CLAUDE.md
Ask for tests before implementation
Review generated tests for correctness
Use sub-agents for parallel test suites
Case Study
Claude Built a C Compiler 100k Lines
Anthropic researcher Nicholas Carlini ran ~2,000 Claude Code sessions in a loop for two weeks — with zero human code.
What Happened
100k lines of Rust — a fully autonomous C compiler
Builds Linux 6.9 across x86, ARM, and RISC-V
Compiles real software — QEMU, FFmpeg, SQLite, PostgreSQL, Redis
Agents coordinated via git — file-based locking prevented duplicate work
No 16-bit x86 — can't generate real-mode boot code (falls back to GCC)
No assembler/linker — depends on external toolchain
Less optimized output — slower than GCC even with optimizations off
Code quality gaps — functional Rust, but not expert-level
Regressions — new features frequently broke existing ones
Takeaway: This demonstrates that AI agents can sustain goal-directed work at massive scale — but also that human-written compilers maintain clear advantages in efficiency and reliability. The scaffolding matters: well-designed tests and clear progress tracking were essential for the agents to make progress.
Working With AI
The Right Mindset
Think of Claude Code as mentoring a chaotic but talented colleague
✅ What Works
Clear instructions — write a CLAUDE.md like an onboarding doc
Review its work — it's brilliant but makes surprising mistakes
Delegate and context-switch — give it a task, go work on something else
Use plan mode — let it think before acting on complex tasks
Play to its strengths — boilerplate, refactoring, tests, exploration
❌ What Doesn't
Watching the terminal — defeats the whole purpose of autonomy
No guardrails — without CLAUDE.md it guesses your conventions
Blind trust — always review before committing
One-shot prompts — iterate, provide feedback, guide it
Expert-level tasks — if you know the domain deeply, you're probably faster
Looking Ahead
The Future Is Agentic
We are witnessing a fundamental shift in how software gets built.
The question is no longer "will AI write code?" but "how do we work alongside agents effectively?"
🚀
Agents Get Smarter
Better reasoning, longer context, fewer hallucinations. Each generation closes the gap with human developers.
🤝
Teams of Agents
Multi-agent systems that plan, implement, test, and review — an autonomous software team on demand.
🌐
Universal Tool Access
Open protocols like MCP connect agents to any system. The walled-garden era of AI tools is ending.
The developer role is evolving
From writing every line of code to
architecting,
reviewing, and
orchestrating autonomous agents.
The best developers will be those who learn to delegate effectively.
IMPORTANT!
If you actually know a subject well, Claude almost certainly knows it worse than you
Often you can write code MUCH better than it can
Frequently you can also write code faster than it can
But its value is that you can give it a task and switch to something else
Or run two tasks in parallel with two Claudes and switch to something else
Or run four tasks and go eat / go sleep
In most cases Claude doesn't improve the quality or speed of your work —
it improves the volume of your work
If you launch it and then just stare at the terminal —
you're most likely losing productivity
The one important exception: technologies you know nothing about —
here you can save hours to weeks